Skip to main content

The exam-focussed school curriculum is outdated

 The school curriculum is so centred around children passing exams, it’s lost touch with what school should be about: another step in helping children be prepared for the ‘real’ world, or the world of work that is almost inevitable in our society.



The curriculum needs to be a well-rounded set of skills that are taught to children in order for them to be able to live independently after moving on in their education, rather than just knowing how to answer 4 essays in 2 hours. There is an argument that school prepares you for exams and your parents prepare you for later life, but this is classist in assuming that children’s parents have both those skills to begin with, and the time to properly teach their children these skills. State schools should provide lessons in more useful life skills, as well as having less exam focussed work, and more subjects that are compulsory for students to learn about society and politics.

It’s clear that schools should teach English and Maths, and almost a consensus that these should be tested in an exam, but subjects like Science and Humanity subjects would surely make sense to be assessed as coursework. Coursework is the best form of assessment, as it means students can showcase their work from months or years in a range of forms that suits them best, in order to show their understanding of the subject. Students should be marked subjectively, their work should show what they do understand and how they understand it, rather than objectively in the same exam for everyone, when different people have different strengths and weaknesses or may have an off-day which would cause them to lose potential future prospects.

It's important that children grow up knowing how to cook easy and healthy meals, so they can avoid being the scapegoat for people when talking about the obesity crisis and blaming those from less well off families for eating junk food instead of healthy food. There should be compulsory lessons in school of food tech, which actually teaches pupils the way to cook a meal from scratch while spending the least amount of time and money, so healthy food is accessible to everyone. Teachers should be able to run through healthy meal options, and students keep a log of healthy recipes they can use in the future while being taught how to make them properly, throughout secondary school. This should also be done in a way that teaches about health, rather than perpetuating diet culture, so that it encourages nutritious food not disordered eating.

Other skills that schools should teach include simple sewing like a button, or sewing up a hole in clothes (in order to encourage keeping clothes for longer, instead of just throwing them away), or simply DIY, like the ability to put up a shelf or a run through of tools and their primary uses. Classes like these would ensure that everyone would have simple skills that make life easier, rather than having to teach themselves. They could also be optional, in order to just teach the pupils that don’t have parents who are able to teach them these things, or don’t have the time to spare to do it.

Personally, I think it’s important that students learn about the country and society they live in, and its history, no matter their opinion at the end of it it’s important they learn about the world. Students should have an understanding of politics within their country, how the voting system works, what the parties stand for, and the constitution of the country, in order for them to exercise their right to vote in the most informed way possible. History should be taught objectively, with an emphasis on racial and sexist history so that everyone can be more informed of the history of minorities and tensions between groups, and therefore more understanding of society as it is now. For this reason, sociology would also be a good compulsory subject, as it means that students can have a broad understanding of the underlying conflicts between groups in society, and how this affects people’s everyday lives. These, however, should be taught on a coursework basis, with no exam at the end, in order to allow for a rounded understanding and an enjoyment of learning, rather than another subject they have to pass an exam in.

Essentially, the school curriculum is exam focussed in order to get pupils to follow a certain path of GCSEs, A Levels, University and a job they stay in the rest of their life, rather than giving students a range of options and encouraging them to follow a path that makes them happy. Schools should provide students with the resources to succeed in what they want in life, and the ability to be healthy with an understanding of the world around them, instead of causing them unnecessary stress with exams and constant tests from the age of 11 onwards.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why the A-Level u turn isn't enough

Too little, too late: the government has scrapped the algorithm that decided thousands of students’ grades for A-Levels this week, but many students don’t feel this is enough to reverse the damage already done. On 17 August, after nearly a week of students and teachers protesting, the decision was announced to reverse the 40% of results downgraded by Ofqual, meaning A-Level results would be based entirely on teacher predictions, rather than the so called ‘algorithm’. The 40% of downgraded students tended to be from state schools, with not a single pupil from Eton, the most well-known private school, having a grade downgraded. The ‘algorithm’ was announced when the government released their strategy to give students grades without them sitting exams, due to COVID-19, and it was said to combine teacher predictions with the school/college’s past performance in those subject areas. This seemed a good idea initially, as it would ensure schools didn’t inflate pupils’ grades in order to i...

Why the UK's electoral system is inherently flawed

  The UK electoral system is named first past the post, where in the election the person with the highest number of votes wins the seat, no matter the percentage of votes they got, or how close the other candidates were to the winning candidate in number of votes. Then, the party with the most seats forms the government.   A key issue with first past the post as a voting system is that it tends to favour a two-party system, where two parties are fairly equally matched in terms of competing in the election, and there is a rotation of the two of them forming the government. This is clear in that since 1922 only the Conservative and Labour party have formed the government in the UK. This could be argued as being a coincidence, or because they are simply the most popular parties, however, first past the post favours the larger parties meaning they are the main parties who have representation. This creates a less legitimate government, as those who vote for a minor party are le...